DEBATE

This rubric is based on on the reaction of the audience, the opposing sides comments and critiques are very much considered sense they are main target audience of the candidates , they want the ones they don't have.

McCain rubric:
persuasion: 9 /10 ( little boring possibly t much facts i can see why Obhama followers get offended, but its not as bad as most say. facts were there but needs to connect with the people a little more some people dont pay enough attention or wont even give him the time of day just to be good and know what hes talking about.)

low blows: 9 /10( they weren't low but he did them)

overall coverage of issues and views: 17 /20 ( didn't do the best, really exaggerated on focus but did have indepth explanations and explained fairly well)

PETHOS: 19/20( to be any more credible he would have to be the president and he was well... McCain like, not completely interesting)

LOGOS: 17 /20 ( focused a lot on the same thing and i think that might of weakened his argument to a point)

ETHOS: 12 /15 ( not enough... Obhama people like emotion and he definitely didn't show enough to win that crowd over at all)

DOMINATION OF DEBATE: 4 /5
------ 88 / 100 ------


OBHAMA:
Persuasion: 8/10

low blows: 8/10

overall coverage of issues and views: 16/20

PETHOS: 16/20

LOGOS: 16/20

ETHOS: 15/15

--- 79/100---